Scott Haywood's home page | Pygmy Rabbit habitat |
Fourth Draft
- June 3, 2004
Principal author: Helen Ulmschneider, Boise District, ID BLM
Review and contributions from:
Dave Hays (WA Dept. Fish and Wildlife)
Hadley Roberts (independent wildlife biologist, ID),
Janet Rachlow (Univ. Idaho)
Todd Forbes (BLM, OR)
John Himes (Nevada Dept. Wildlife, now at Texas Parks and Wildlife Dept.)
Eveline Sequin (Univ. Nevada-Reno, NV)
Marcy Haworth (FWS, Reno, NV)
Todd Katzner (Univ. Wyoming, now at Imperial College, London, England)
Adam Kozlowski (Utah Div. Wildlife Resources)
Ryan Rauscher (Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks)
Pat Lauridson (CA Dept. Fish and Game)
Pygmy rabbits are a BLM Sensitive
Species which occur through most of the Great Basin. Although
it has been petitioned for listing under the Endangered Species Act,
its distribution and population trends are largely unknown. In
recent years, biologists in most of the western states have surveyed
for and found populations of this rabbit, although there is still much
area to inventory. On February 26, 2003, biologists from various
federal and state agencies and universities met in Reno to discuss the
current state of knowledge and future work needed for pygmy rabbits.
Development of a consistent method for surveying for pygmy rabbits across
their range was identified as a high priority. A westwide survey
subgroup was formed which helped develop this current paper, based largely
on a previous effort by the Idaho BLM pygmy rabbit survey committee.
The intended audience for this
paper is biologists who will be surveying for pygmy rabbits. Our
purpose is to help you find pygmy rabbits, by using a standardized but
flexible and realistic approach. The information presented is
a collation of field knowledge gained by biologists who have surveyed
for pygmy rabbits in Idaho, Nevada, Utah, Wyoming, Washington, Oregon,
and California. This paper describes pygmy rabbit habitat, how
to recognize and evaluate rabbit sign, an approach for organizing and
conducting broad-scale surveys, and how to record data. It also
includes discussion of some other survey techniques. It includes
photos of habitat and burrows. This is a work in progress and
may be modified as we learn more about the variety of habitats used
by pygmy rabbits, pygmy rabbit sign, and about surveying for these rabbits.
The goal of the broad scale
survey described here is primarily to find populations of the rabbit.
However, by conducting surveys and recording data in the manner described,
locations and a measure of burrow density and "occupancy status" can
be obtained at the same time, which can provide a baseline index for
population monitoring, and a way to coarsely compare different areas.
These surveys will document not only where the rabbits are but also
where they are not, which is useful information for refining habitat
models, and for land managers.
We recommend that biologists
surveying or studying pygmy rabbits across the range of the species
will use the included form to gather the basic population data identified
(burrow locations and status), although they may add or delete other
data to suit their specific needs. This way, it will be easier
to compare population indices across the west and across the years.
Field Training
A key piece of advice: The
rabbits themselves are secretive and difficult to see; thus it is being
familiar with their habitat and sign that is the key to finding populations.
Before surveying, look at pygmy rabbit habitat, burrows and pellets
with an experienced person in the field. If possible, also look
at badger and ground squirrel diggings, to help you learn to distinguish
the differences between their burrows and those of pygmy rabbits.
Descriptions and pictures are helpful, but there's no substitute for
seeing it in the field. Biologists from different states with
experience in surveying for pygmy rabbits are listed in Appendix A.
Habitat
There are two main features
of pygmy rabbit habitat: relatively taller and denser big sagebrush
(Artemisia tridentata) (but see below) and deep soils.
Sagebrush
Usually burrows are found in
the taller and denser big sagebrush in an area. The height of
the sagebrush can vary enormously, from about 1 ½ to 7 feet. Density
can also vary, but commonly the sagebrush is so dense right at burrows
that it is difficult to walk through. This means > 30% cover.
Various subspecies of sagebrush are used, including Wyoming (A. t. wyomingensis),
mountain (A. t. vaseyana), and Great Basin (A. t. tridentata).
Other shrub species may be present, including bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata),
rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus spp.), greasewood (Sarcobatus vermiculatus),
snowberry (Symphoricarpos spp.), and juniper (Juniperus
spp.).
In some habitats used by pygmy
rabbit in Oregon and Nevada, rabbitbrush is dominant or co-dominant
with sagebrush, and burrows occasionally or commonly occur under large
dense rabbitbrush (T. Forbes, OR; E. Sequin, NV, pers. comm.) and greasewood
(J. Himes, NV, pers. comm.). The burrows are so hidden under the
canopy that they are often only found by lifting the vegetation.
Pygmy rabbits also may occupy
habitat that does not appear ideal: with short sagebrush and "bad" soil.
In east-central Idaho, pygmy rabbits occupy "mima mounds" (mounds of
soil several feet high and approximately 20-30 feet in diameter) with
taller and denser sage, which are dotted in a landscape of shorter and
thinner sagebrush (Roberts 2001). Katzner and Kozlowski (pers.
comm.) both emphasize that it is important to keep an open mind, and
not develop set ideas about what comprises pygmy rabbit habitat too
early, or you may overlook inhabited areas. In Wyoming, Katzner
(pers. comm.) has seen pygmy rabbits in areas that he initially would
not have thought were habitat. In Montana, the average sagebrush
height in occupied sites was only about 15 inches. There, Rauscher
(pers. comm.) has often found them in areas where the sagebrush is not
very dense and only knee-high or less, especially in mountain bowls
and where sagebrush has been manipulated. In Utah, pygmy rabbits have
been found to occupy 12 to 120-inch tall sagebrush. Regardless of the
absolute height of the vegetation, the rabbits will almost always burrow
in the tallest and densest sagebrush on the landscape.
Soils
Generally, pygmy rabbits burrow
in loamy soils deeper than 20 inches. Soil composition needs to
be able to support a burrow system with numerous entrances, but also
must be soft enough for digging. A habitat model from the Univ.
of Idaho (Rachlow and Svancara 2003) used a clay content of 13 to 30%,
but models from Idaho State Univ. (Simons and Laundre 2001) used <13.5
% clay. In central Washington, pygmy rabbits are found
only in areas with deep loamy soils. In southwest Idaho,
they occur in areas with soils classified as stony sandy loam, and sandy
loam over sandy clay and clay loam. In east-central Idaho,
soils are gravelly outwash plains with lime-coated rocks. On the
lava plains of southeast Idaho, rabbits will often burrow between or
under lava boulders. In Nevada, soils are light-colored and friable.
At the Landscape Scale
Pygmy rabbits are found in
alluvial fans, swales in a rolling landscape, large flat valleys, at
the foot of mountains, along creek and drainage bottoms, in basins in
the mountains, or other landscape features where soil may have accumulated
to greater depths. They are generally on flatter ground, sometimes
on moderate slopes, and not on steep ground.
At the Patch Scale
Look for relatively taller,
denser big sagebrush (not low sage) and areas where there appears to
be a non-uniform distribution of sage, in other words, where the texture
of the sagebrush stand is uneven, or "lumpy", in both height and density.
When scanning across a valley these clumps stand out as taller, or as
having a different color. It is fairly effective to go directly
to these areas to begin a search. Also look for signs of digging, and
for soil surface that is not flat and level. The rabbits tend
to mound up the soil where they have been burrowing over the years.
Drainage bottoms and sagebrush draws with a relatively uniform coverage
of sagebrush are also often used by pygmy rabbits.
Habitat Descriptions by State
Idaho: Areas with mounded
topography - mima mounds' - are prime areas to target for surveys.
In the Salmon, Idaho area, alluvial plains where rabbits are found are
dotted with mounds about 20-30 ft in diameter, 1-2 ft tall, several
hundred feet or yards apart, where the sagebrush is taller than in the
surrounding intermound spaces. On 1:24,000 aerial photos, these
mounds can be seen as a pattern of darker dots, extending over many
miles of landscape (Photo 1 - Rocky Canyon); and from the ground, the
mounds appear as lenses of darker and taller sage. The mounds are where
the pygmy rabbits burrow. In southwest Idaho, a similar habitat
is big sagebrush islands intermingled with low sagebrush (Artemisia
arbuscula)( Photo 2 - Hutch Springs, Photo 3 - Mudflat Rd with Lynell).
These kinds of areas are also visible on aerial photos).
In the mahogany (Cercocarpus
ledifolius) savannah in the Owyhees of southwest Idaho, the rabbits
are found in swales of taller sagebrush (photo 4 - aerial of mahogany
savannah, photo 5- Dry Cr.) Mounding of the soil is present, but does
not form distinctive mima mounds. A dotted pattern is usually
not visible on 1:24,000 aerial photographs, although careful examination
can show subtle and dim dotting. The soil does end up mounded
where the pygmy rabbits have been digging their burrows and maintaining
them over time.
Another major habitat in the
Bruneau plateau country is the bottoms and lower slopes of small drainages
where the sagebrush is denser and taller, indicating deeper soils (Photos
6 -& 7).
Oregon: Habitats in Oregon are very similar to those in Idaho. Most habitat is comprised of areas where big sagebrush inclusions are mixed with low sagebrush, rabbit brush, or shorter stature big sagebrush. Mounding similar to mima mounding' occurs in most of these sites (Photos 8, 9, 10, 11). Sagebrush on the mounds is usually 1-3 feet taller than that of the surrounding area. These mounds or clumps of big sagebrush can be spaced from a few feet to hundreds of feet apart.
The second most common type of habitat in Oregon is small draw bottoms where deeper soils have collected. Most of these sites are vegetated with basin big sagebrush in the drainage bottom, surrounded by Wyoming big sagebrush, low sagebrush, or mountain big sagebrush in the surrounding uplands. Some mounding can occur in these areas, but it is absent or very subtle. Burrows in these areas seem to be restricted to the very bottom of the drainages or the lower inside slopes of the drainage itself. Some areas with rabbits are dominated by rabbitbrush (Photo 12 - rabbitbrush).
Nevada: In Nevada pygmy
rabbits are found in broad valley floors, drainage bottoms, alluvial
fans, and other areas with friable soils. Burrows can be located in
mounds (either natural or human caused) when they are available in these
types of soils. Pygmy rabbit burrows are easiest to find in light colored,
friable soils. These soils are usually found in valley bottoms and can
be associated with rabbitbrush / sagebrush vegetation. The understory
of grasses and forbs can vary from almost none (as in the Reese River
Valley) to dense (as in the Sheldon Range). When there are a lot of
rabbits present in a valley they are generally distributed throughout
the area. However, when there are only a few individuals, they are generally
located in the largest, most dense clumps of vegetation (as in the White
River Valley).
Montana:
Pygmy rabbits are found in habitats similar to those in Idaho and Oregon:
large intermountain valley bottoms, alluvial fans, mountain valleys
and bowls, drainage bottoms, plateaus, rolling sagebrush plains and
isolated patches of sagebrush in grasslands. Preferred habitat
in Montana appears to be gently sloping or nearly level floodplains
where adequate sagebrush and appropriate soils exist. However,
many occupied sites have marginal sagebrush cover and shallower soils.
Areas that contain mima-like mounds are good areas to investigate.
If pygmy rabbits are found in these areas, they generally occur throughout
the continuous sagebrush coverage at varying densities and up into sagebrush
drainages.
Wyoming: Pygmy rabbits
occur in swales of taller, denser sagebrush in a setting of hillsides
with thinly distributed, shorter sage. Although there have
been no quantitative studies comparing pygmy rabbit habitats in different
areas, the habitat in Wyoming appears different from that in Washington,
Oregon, Nevada, and western Idaho (Katzner, pers. comm.). The
overall impression from observation is that the sagebrush in Wyoming
is denser and often less heavily grazed, with more standing dead sagebrush,
and more Great Basin big sage. The general areas used by pygmy
rabbits have evenly distributed, taller, and more structurally diverse
sagebrush with a dense canopy. Three subspecies of big sagebrush can
be present, Great Basin, Wyoming, and mountain. Surrounding unused
areas have fewer, shorter, shrubs with less vegetative cover.
Utah:
The site characteristics of areas inhabited by pygmy rabbits in Utah
vary considerably, because they occupy three different ecoregions (U.S.
EPA): Central Basin and Range, Wyoming Basin, and the Wasatch and Uintah
Mountain. These regions vary significantly in latitude, elevation,
precipitation, and geologic history. Pygmy rabbits are found
throughout the western half of the state in habitat ranging from 4800
to 7800 feet in elevation and 0° to 20° slopes. Some evidence
suggests that Pleistocene Lake Bonneville has excluded the rabbits from
the lowest elevations of the Great Basin. Rabbits occur both in
alluvial deposits and in favorable microsites on bench tops. Habitat
in Utah's northern or high elevation sites is characterized by Wyoming,
mountain, and Basin big sagebrush, with bitterbrush and snowberry present
at the highest elevations. (Photos 13, 14 - Northern Utah habitat).
Burrow habitat in southern, low elevation sites is often limited to
the bottom of gentle drainages supporting Wyoming sagebrush amid a black
sage, shadscale, and gray molly community of minimal height (28 cm).
Understory condition is variable: many sites have grasses and forbs
in excellent condition, but some of the most numerous pygmy rabbit populations
discovered are in chronically grazed areas (sheep and cattle) being
targeted for rehabilitation. In all parts of its Utah range, burrowing
by the pygmy rabbit appears to be part of a positive feedback system:
the rabbits choose the tallest, densest sagebrush, and their burrowing
and the mounding it causes appears to help taller, denser sagebrush
to grow. Especially in the lowest elevations, raised mounds provide
relief from shallow water tables and alkali soil chemistry allowing
growth of better cover and forage species.
California: Northeastern
California has historical records of pygmy rabbits but has not been
surveyed recently. Recent surveys have documented rabbits in the Mono
Lake area. Pygmy rabbit habitat in Northeastern California is
very similar to adjacent Nevada habitat. Two habitat types occur
in the Mono area (photos 15, 16). Near Mono Lake, pygmy rabbits
occur in islands of big sagebrush and loamy soils, similar to areas
in Nevada, but with sandier soils (Photo). Burrows tend to be
in sandy loam soils, which are often surrounded by very sandy soils.
The second area, near Bodie, has shorter, more uniform sagebrush, often
less than 3 ft tall, with less clumping of the sagebrush. The
elevation at this site is 8400 ft, one of the highest known populations.
Pygmy Rabbit
Sign
Burrows- (Photos 17-20)
It is common to find many old
burrows, with no fresh pellets, while surveying. In general, unoccupied
old burrows appear to last some years. However, in Nevada, Sequin (pers.
comm.) has observed extensive burrow systems "melt" completely into
non-existence over the course of two to four weeks of wet weather in
certain soils. All evidence of burrows was erased. Some
of these burrows had been associated with very high pygmy rabbit activity
just a few weeks prior. Later, the rabbits appear to return and
dig burrows again.
Pellets-( Photos 21-22)
Rabbit pellets are distinctive: round, without dents or points, different from those of any other group of animals. Pygmy rabbit pellets are the smallest of the rabbit pellets, averaging 4-6 mm in diameter. However, the size can vary. Pregnant females produce bigger pellets, as large as cottontails, and up to 11 mm in diameter! (Dave Hays, pers. comm.). Young cottontails can produce very small pellets. Usually the size of pellets is uniform within a pellet group.
Other Burrows (photos 23-26)
Deciding whether burrows are pygmy rabbit or not
It is the combination of all indicators that you need to consider, both of the burrow itself, pellets, and the pattern of burrows on the landscape. No other animal digs burrows with the combination of features of those of the pygmy rabbit: in tall dense sagebrush habitat, burrow entrance 5-7 inches average diameter, located under sagebrush, a number of burrow systems in an area, and small round pellets. A burrow system with a carpet of small rabbit pellets around it is diagnostic of pygmy rabbits.
Sign in Snow
During winter, pygmy rabbit
tracks and pellets in the snow can be more obvious than other times
of the year. Pygmy rabbit tracks can generally be distinguished
from other rabbits by the size of the hind foot (Table 1). During
winter, juvenile cottontails are nearly the same size as adults, which
should minimize overlap in track size between the species.
Table 1. Rabbit track sizes, from information in Forrest 1988, Green and Flinders 1980, and Katzner 1994.
Pygmy Rabbit |
Cottontail |
Jackrabbit | ||||
Back foot length |
1.8-2.5 in |
46-71 mm |
3-3.5 in |
77-90 mm |
3.5 -4 in |
90-103 mm |
One track set (4 feet) |
6-8 in |
6.5-11 in |
10-30 in |
|||
Between track sets |
6-16 in |
8-22 in |
10-60 in |
Both Rauscher and Katzner (pers.
comm.) have observed that pygmy rabbits traveling in fresh snow will
re-use the same tracks, leaping from spot to spot a few inches apart
(launching-and-landing sites), and leaving a diagnostic pattern.
This keeps the rabbits relatively clear of snow and means that they
can move much more easily in new snow than if they had to break trail
every time they moved. As the rabbits use those sites for several
days, the launching-and-landing sites get larger and larger and eventually
become a continuous trail. Other rabbit species do not create
this initial stage of re-used launching-and-landing sites. Over
time, in older snow, pygmy rabbits create a complex maze of continuous
trails between burrows (Ulmschneider, pers. obs.).
It can be quite effective and
efficient to drive two-track roads in sagebrush areas a day or two after
a light snow, looking for launching and landing sites, measuring rabbit
tracks, and following weasel or other predator tracks to locate pygmy
rabbits (Rauscher, Katzner pers. comm.). To find burrows, it can also
be useful to look where snow on a sagebrush forms an umbrella with a
cave underneath. Rabbits often use these areas and pellets and
tracks will be found underneath. (Sequin, pers. comm.).
In the snow, active burrows will be obvious with tracks leading into
and out from the entrances.
Snow tracking is also an excellent
way to obtain detailed habitat use data. In Utah, intensive snow
tracking was conducted in 2003-2004 on a high elevation (7400 ft) site
that had been thoroughly surveyed during the preceding spring and summer.
Six to ten hours after a fresh snow, tracks of pygmy rabbits were followed
by an observer with a GPS unit. Burrow clusters were considered
the sample unit as it was too difficult to distinguish individuals.
When overlaid on 1 m resolution imagery, GPS-mapped snow tracks illuminate
social interactions between rabbits from different burrow clusters (gene
flow), and maximum travel distances from burrows. Uninterrupted
tracks extended for several kilometers, creating meta-burrow complexes.
Most importantly, habitat parameters being measured are representative
of the rabbits' foraging and social behaviors, not just their burrow
locations. It was generally agreed among participating researchers
that radio telemetry could not have provided an equivalent level of
resolution without disturbing the rabbit.
Organizing and
Conducting Surveys
Targeting habitat
Pygmy rabbits are not randomly
distributed within the sagebrush landscape, they are patchily distributed,
because they choose particular soils and sagebrush habitats, and they
do not appear to be abundant in many situations. Additionally, we cannot
yet accurately predict with models where they might occur. With
a patchy distribution, random survey methods that might work well for
a more evenly distributed animal would be ineffective and inefficient.
It is necessary to first target habitat as best you can, that is, to
sort out the most likely habitat. We describe below a several-stage
approach to doing this, using aerial photos, soil and vegetation maps,
Geographic Information Systems (GIS, if available), field knowledge,
and driving and walking in the field as the final step to target where
to look for pygmy rabbits.
Landscape Scale: The
most basic components to use in a GIS model or other map are sagebrush
types overlaid on soils (composition and depth). One kind of area
to target for surveys is regions where big and low sagebrush are intermingled.
Some models have added slope, aspect, fire history, and elevation, but
these would be secondary parameters after first delineating sagebrush
types and soils.
Fire history can be relevant
but you need to know whether sagebrush has come back in or not.
The timescale for this will vary enormously depending on whether its
mountain sagebrush (maybe 15 years) or Wyoming sagebrush (maybe 100
years or never). So you must include this difference in a model.
Aspect may be relevant if windblown soils are being deposited on the
lee sides of hills, as in Gabler's model for the Idaho National Engineering
and Environmental Laboratory, and Himes' model for east-central Nevada.
Slope and elevation may be somewhat useful, after first delineating
potential habitat using sagebrush types and soils.
For examples of GIS models from Idaho, see Rachlow and Svancara 2003, or Gabler et al 2000. John Himes (Texas Parks and Wildlife Dept.) has developed one for east-central Nevada, currently in review for publication. Be cautious with GIS models - we don't have successful ones yet. The Idaho models need refinement. The data used for both models did not distinguish between low sagebrush and big sagebrush. This resulted in the models rating as habitat large homogenous expanses of low sage with very rocky shallow soils, where no pygmy rabbits are found. Areas where pygmy rabbits were subsequently found in southwest Idaho were not targeted, some prime areas with intermingled big and low sagebrush.
The lessons from these efforts
are that better habitat models are needed, as well as finer-scale, more
accurate soil and sagebrush data. Additionally, there is no substitute
for knowing what to look for from field experience, and going in the
field and looking.
Mid-scale: Examine aerial photos,
topographic maps, and use local knowledge to add or delete areas from
your initial map. It is usually possible to distinguish dense
sagebrush or to see mounds of taller, denser sagebrush as a dotted or
mottled pattern on aerial photos. Local knowledge will help to
eliminate burned areas that haven't regrown to sagebrush- e.g. some
large old fires in the very southwest corner of Idaho are still vegetated
with grass, but are included in the 2003 GIS model because they burned
more than 15 years ago (the parameter used in the model). In Oregon,
biologists have had success with flying over sagebrush landscapes and
identifying dense areas of sagebrush for future ground surveys.
You could combine surveys for sage grouse or big game with surveys for
pygmy rabbit habitat.
Rank the areas you identified
at the large scale, and start surveys in the most likely areas.
These would be the largest blocks on the sagebrush and soils map which
weren't eliminated by your refinements, areas surrounding past records,
areas where aerial photos show mounds of sagebrush as a dotted pattern
(see example photo at end), where big and low sagebrush are interspersed,
and where there are swales of deep soils and tall dense sage.
Fine scale: You will probably
have to make the final choice of where to walk a survey route while
you are in the field, because the available data are not at a fine enough
scale to do this from a distance. While you are driving to or in a chosen
area, look for dense tall sage, especially with a "lumpy" or uneven
texture, as well as for signs of digging. Sometimes, particularly
where soils are light-colored or contain white, lime-covered rocks thrown
out by digging, the mounds of freshly dug soil or white rocks are visible
from the road. However, in darker soils this is not true, and
you have to walk to see burrows. When a suitable area is spotted, stop
and walk a survey route.
Your sampling scheme will be
dictated by your particular circumstances, both by how the potential
habitat is distributed and by your "person-power". Your planned
survey intensity for each area will vary with its priority, the size
of the area you want to survey, and the people available to do it.
Depending on travel time and whether you are finding burrows, (which
will slow you down), you might expect to complete about 3 to 7 miles
of walking transects in a day. Conduct the greatest amount of sampling
in high priority areas, less sampling in lower priority areas.
Portion your survey efforts among your highest priorities, with some
sampling in lower priority habitat also, as a check on your ability
to target habitat.
In snow: Areas where
pygmy rabbits are concentrated will attract predators: coyote, badger,
bobcat, and weasel. You can use their tracks to help guide you
to pygmy rabbit areas, and even to burrows.
Patch scale:
While you are walking a survey route you should target the tallest,
densest patches of sage. These patches look like islands that stand
out above the rest.
Survey Routes
The goal of a survey route
is to check enough habitat in an efficient manner to determine whether
pygmy rabbits are present or not, and secondarily to get an index of
density of burrows. The goal is not to map out the total patch
of habitat or to map every burrow within the habitat. Therefore
you will not be trying to walk the perimeter of the population to map
its extent, or to completely inventory the habitat, because this can
be very time-consuming. Mapping a polygon requires a lot of walking
to determine, first, whether rabbits are there, and their extent, and
then walk the whole perimeter to map it with a GPS unit. It is
simpler and faster to walk a meandering line through a habitat patch,
targeting the most likely looking places (instead of the edge), and
then continue on to the next swale or habitat patch, or loop back the
other side of the valley. If you map your route and record results well,
especially if you use a GPS unit, your survey route will be repeatable.
There are several advantages
of recording burrow system locations with a GPS unit as you walk a survey
route, as opposed to just tallying them. If you use the "repeat"
feature (which fills out each new feature with the data from the previous
one, so you only have to change a few things), it only takes a few seconds
to record a burrow system as a point using a GPS unit, and will not
appreciably increase your survey time. The advantages to having the
data in this electronic form are many. You can directly download
the points to a GIS map and see the pattern of distribution and density
on the large scale. If you only record your survey route, and
not the burrow points, you will not be able to easily see this pattern.
Being able to see the points displayed on a GIS map is useful for refining
your understanding of small-to-large scale distribution and habitat.
Displaying the points on a background of orthophotoquads will help you
with interpreting habitat from aerial photos, and will help you draw
the extent of habitat patches on a topographic map or aerial photo.
Recording burrow system locations
is a more complete record for those who come after you and want to repeat
your work to determine changes over time - they will know exactly what
you found where. For example, on a 2-mile long survey route, you
may have found clusters of burrows in only a couple places. You can
create a baseline for long-term monitoring at the same time as doing
an initial survey, because you have a repeatable survey line along with
very site-specific results. By recording burrow points along your
survey line you can determine the whether the distribution of burrow
complexes changes over time, which will help us understand how to interpret
old burrow complexes.
If you are alone, walk in a
loop or triangle, targeting patches of taller, denser sage, looking
for pygmy rabbit burrows and pellets. The goal of a looping or triangular
route is to survey during all your walking time, and to avoid walking
without actually surveying. You may walk through some unsuitable-looking
sagebrush, but these data will be useful for helping distinguish where
the rabbits do not occur, and will function as a check on your ability
to target habitat. Using a topo map, you should be able to design a
route that takes you up one swale and down another, or up and down two
sides of a valley. In patchy habitat and where patches are small
and follow the contours of the land, following the landforms and targeting
the taller sagebrush clumps will be most effective. This means
your survey line will be meandering, not straight.
If the habitat is uniform or
on extensive flats, as in Nevada, straight transect lines arranged in
a triangle, or a spiral pattern may be appropriate. For a spiral
transect, walk directly to the center of a large, dense sagebrush patch,
and then spiral your way out, gradually increasing the diameter of your
circle until the habitat is no longer appropriate. To fully check
out a potential site often takes about one hour of survey time (Eveline
Sequin, pers. comm.).
Transect length should be dictated
by the extent of the habitat patch, road distribution, and the amount
of overall habitat you have identified to cover. Surveys
in Idaho have shown that you will likely need to walk at least ½ mile
to check an area for presence of pygmy rabbits with any degree of confidence,
because of the distances between burrow systems, unless you find burrows
immediately.
With two people working together,
one-way linear transects may work, by "leapfrogging": one person is
dropped off to begin a survey route, the second drives ahead and starts
another survey route; the first person ends up at the truck and drives
ahead to pick up the second. If two people walk a survey route in tandem,
the width each can cover will be determined by the habitat, but may
be on the order of 100 ft., or 50 ft to each side. When two people
are surveying together, each can simultaneously sample opposite sides
of the road when the road bisects suitable habitat .
When you drive through unsuitable
looking habitat within a generally potential habitat area, stop occasionally
and walk a short survey route, as a check on your judgement of habitat,
and record your transect walked. Note why the habitat looks unsuitable.
Remember that zeroes' are as important to record as finding pygmy rabbit
sign. These data will be used to refine habitat models, and will
let us know where to and where not to focus management for pygmy rabbits.
Dogs and horses may be useful
during surveys, if available. Dogs can let you know when a burrow
is inhabited (though not what animal it is), and may flush rabbits.
Horses can be used to survey more quickly than on foot.
Area search
When you find several current
burrows and you are inventorying a new area, (or if you have not yet
seen a pygmy rabbit in the area) take about a half hour to search the
area looking for pygmy rabbits. This will help confirm whether
you have pygmy rabbits, and will help you gain confidence in your ability
to distinguish pygmy rabbit sign. So far you have had the search
image for a burrow, and have been looking down. Now, switch, get
the search image for movement and rabbits, and walk slowly, in widening
circles around the active sites, looking ahead. Rabbits will often
slip quietly into the burrow as you approach, and you have to be alert
for the slight movement. Once you learn how to look for the actual
animal, you will begin to see them more (Dave Hays, pers com.).
Pygmy rabbits are easy to distinguish from mountain cottontails. When running away, the white of a mountain cottontail tail is usually visible. Pygmy rabbits do not have any white on their tail. Also, pygmy rabbits seldom run as far as mountain cottontails. Pygmy rabbits will scamper a short distance and stop, often under sagebrush plant or near a burrow entrance.
Surveys in Washington, Idaho,
Nevada, and Oregon have shown considerable variation in the amount of
fresh sign at burrows over the course of a year. During late summer
and early fall pellets can be scarce at burrows. Burrow complexes
that had lots of sign in winter or spring may appear almost deserted
in late summer, with few pellets present, and then appear repopulated
later.
Pygmy rabbits may use burrows
less in summer and fall. In the fall, in SW Idaho, Ulmschneider
found many burrows in big sagebrush islands on a valley bottom, with
a mix of old and a few brown pellets. Several hundred yards away,
under very dense tall sagebrush and bitterbrush on a rocky side slope,
lots of fresh small pellets and a pygmy rabbit were observed, although
no burrows were found right there. Rachlow (pers. comm.) found
a similar situation in the summer in Montana, where there were lots
of small pellets but no burrows in very tall sagebrush, and lots of
burrows with few pellets in a nearby area. Apparently pygmy rabbits
may abandon their burrows at that time of year in favor of dense cover,
perhaps due to parasites. Himes (pers. comm.) also observed pygmy
rabbit pellets without burrows in dense sage in Nevada in late summer.
In Nevada, Sequin (pers. comm.)
has observed pygmy rabbits using certain areas dominated by rabbitbrush
only during the dryer part of the year, late spring through fall.
These areas have "loamier" soils that are much wetter in winter.
Burrows in these areas often disintegrate during the winter, and there
is no evidence of rabbits remaining in the area, by tracks, photo monitoring,
or sightings. New burrows are then excavated in this habitat in
spring. However, during all seasons, rabbits were still found
in the adjacent sagebrush-dominated areas.
Winter may be a better time
of year to confirm rabbit presence than the summer and fall. After
a fresh light snow, fresh tracks and fresh pellets are obvious.
Also, rabbits clean out burrow entrances after a snow, which helps identify
occupied burrows. Pygmy tracks can often be followed to a burrow
entrance. Winter logistics can become difficult, though, as snow
deepens. Additionally, rabbits begin to burrow under the snow as it
deepens, and you may not see much sign on the surface.
When initial surveys are conducted
in the summer, and if you find possible or "old" pygmy rabbit sign,
plan to return in late fall or winter and check again. For monitoring
known populations, the time of the year should be consistent.
In the spring, rabbits appear
to be active at their burrows; however, pellets can be more confusing
because pregnant females make larger pellets that can be confused with
cottontail.
Recording data
The basics to record are where
and when you surveyed, whether you found burrows and pellets or not,
and burrow locations and status. If you did find pygmy rabbit
burrows, categorize, count them, and map them and your survey route.
Classify the status of each
pygmy rabbit burrow system (not each entrance) according to the following
system:
Used burrow plus fresh pellets (B+FP): brown pellets near a burrow, at least one entrance open, without cobwebs or debris that shows lack of use, usually shows a trail. In snow, tracks and/or pellets visible.
Unused burrow plus fresh pellet (UB+FP): burrow entrances have cobwebs, grass seeds, or other debris in entrance, but with brown pellets. May show transitory use.
Burrow plus old pellets (B+OP): only grey pellets at a burrow, entrances may show signs of non-use.
Burrow, no pellets (B): burrow entrance is not collapsed but no pellets found. Also use this category for burrows in snow where no tracks or pellets are visible.
Collapsed burrow (Col): No pellets
Pellets only (P): No burrows found, but pellets appear right for pygmy rabbit. (Collect and label.)
Fresh digging at a burrow but no pellets (B+dig): Digging may have been by a predator such as coyote or badger. If it was a predator, it was most likely digging after prey, and the prey may have been pygmy rabbit.
Possible PR burrow (Poss):
Burrow seems right for pygmy rabbit, but there are confusing pellets
or no pellets, or it is not in association with other pygmy rabbit burrows
(identified by pellets or sightings).
There are several options for
recording data, depending on the equipment available: electronically
with GPS units, paper data forms, topographic maps, and aerial photos.
With GPS units, one might think that it would be easy to map a polygon
delineating a pygmy rabbit population, instead of walking a transect
and mapping burrows. However, in the field one soon finds that
mapping polygons is difficult and complicated, unless they are very
small, and generally requires much more wandering about than walking
a transect through a habitat patch, as you try to determine the extent
of an often complicated population, exactly where the burrows stop,
and then try to walk the perimeter. Additionally, a transect with
burrow points added up along it will give you an index of burrow density
that can be measured in future years (most GPS units are accurate within
about 2 meters), which a polygon will not give you. If you try
to do both, you will greatly lose efficiency! The simplest way
to delineate the habitat is to draw the approximate extent of the habitat
on a topographic map or aerial photo, after you finish your transect.
1. GPS unit with a data dictionary (e.g., GeoExplorer 3): note your projection on a data sheet e.g., NAD 27. (A "data dictionary" is an electronic data form that can be filled out directly into the GPS unit, and later downloaded directly to a computer. It can be created to match the paper data form given at the end of this paper.)
With a Geo Explorer 3 or other GPS unit that has capability for a data dictionary:
2. GPS unit without a data dictionary:
3. No GPS unit (or GPS unit with a dead battery!)
Other Methods
Traps
Trapping is not effective for
general surveys. It may be useful once you know where you have
the right burrows for further study or to confirm presence. Even in
areas with known dense populations of pygmy rabbits, and putting traps
right in the entrances of burrows that show fresh activity, trapping
success rates are low (0-4%). Burrows are always there and usually
distinctive, and therefore are more useful for general surveys.
Camera with automatic trigger (from Eveline Sequin)
Cameras can be used to determine
if pygmy rabbits are currently active in an area. Photographs provide
direct and convincing evidence that rabbits are present and provide
a permanent record. Once burrows are located, or unconfirmed sightings
are reported, cameras can be left at the site with minimal human attention
to collect the required data. Cameras are able to visually detect pygmy
rabbits at locations where other survey methods do not detect them,
and may be especially helpful in the spring when the potential presence
of other young rabbits may confuse pellet surveys.
Equipment for an "active" camera
set-up consists of a camera connected to an infrared beam unit (sender
and receiver) that triggers the camera when the beam is interrupted.
These infrared units are sold as burglar alarms for modest prices at
electronic stores such as Radio Shackâ. "Passive" camera setups are
triggered by a motion or heat sensor. Active infrared cameras
have proven to be more cost effective than passive cameras because they
can easily be set in vegetated areas without being triggered by the
surrounding moving vegetation.
First a site inspection should
be conducted by walking around the area looking for burrowing activity,
animals and fresh pellets. Next, set up one active infrared-triggered
camera in a central location (near burrows if they have been located).
Cameras can be set either across the entrance of an active burrow, or
across an open area nearby. The receiver should be set to trigger the
camera if the infrared beam is blocked for 0.5 seconds (1 infrared pulse,
or the minimum amount of pulses the unit will allow). To make the camera
units even more sensitive, reduce the width of the infrared lens to
1 mm with black electrical tape. This combination of settings is responsive
enough to capture full body images of rabbits even when they are surprised
by the flash or noise. Set the transmitter about 2-4m from the receiver
and camera allowing plenty of area for rabbits to travel between the
two units. The beam should be set at a height of approximately 5 cm.
Set a camera delay of 1 or 2 minutes so that one animal will not use
up the entire roll of film. Use 100 or 200 ASA film, and set the cameras
to be active 24 hours a day. In locations where pygmy rabbits are known
to be active, it was shown that cameras were usually able to record
their presence over the course of one week. Depending on the site and
the season, the roll of film will be used up in a few days or over the
span of a week. In winter, snow may trigger the camera and use all film
in an hour.
It is possible to distinguish pygmy rabbits from other rabbits (juvenile jackrabbits, cottontails) using this method. Adult pygmy rabbits can be distinguished reliably by their tails, heads, ear shape, and size in relation to camera equipment. Juvenile cottontails and jackrabbits can be distinguished by tails, head and ear shape, and coloration. Individual rabbits are generally photographed multiple times at one camera location. Therefore, even if not every photograph is entirely conclusive, the multiple angles of single individuals allow for conclusive evidence. If for some reason only one questionable photograph is received, the camera can always be set out for another week. Comparison photos of rabbit species by Eveline Sequin may be viewed at www.wildlife.utah.gov/habitat.
Spotlighting
It is possible to see pygmy
rabbits by spotlighting at night; however, it is not as effective or
efficient as looking for burrows. Burrows are permanent and easy
to spot once you know what to look for, and you can look for them in
the day. Spotlighting may be useful for confirming presence by
seeing a rabbit once you find an area with burrows, however, the daytime
area searches described above are probably more practical. Rauscher
reports, "I attempted to spotlight pygmy rabbits in an area I knew to
have a relatively high density of rabbits. I only saw 2 pygmy
rabbits. This method is not very effective."
Peeper Probe
This is a flexible cable with
an infrared camera on the end, allowing you to look down a burrow.
It may be useful, once you have found burrows, in spotting a rabbit
or helping to identify what species dug a burrow in questionable cases.
You may be able to figure out how to distinguish the underground features
of pygmy rabbit burrows versus other burrows. Rauscher in Montana
has used these probes in known occupied sites, and was able to see pygmy
rabbits; however, he thinks that it is probably not too useful or effective
for general surveys. The peeper probe may be useful for some aspects
of demographic studies, such as looking into natal dens (J. Rachlow,
pers. comm.) Females apparently dig single, simple burrows for
giving birth, and fill the entrance with dirt, so these burrows may
be hard to find.
Inquire of Locals; Check Hunting Records
Ask hunters or ranchers who
have bagged or claim to have seen pygmy rabbits. On all state-owned
Wildlife Management Areas that permit hunting, hunters are required
to fill out and submit a card afterwards that indicates their kill to
the respective state wildlife agency, which would be an additional way
of determining potential sites to survey for pygmy rabbits
Track Plots
To determine presence of pygmy
rabbits near a burrow, lay aluminum tracking sheets on the ground or
make cleared track plots, and cover them with a thin layer of fine dust
to record tracks.
Literature Cited
Gabler, K.I., J.W. Laundre
and L.T. Heady. 2000. Predicting the suitability of habitat
in southeast Idaho for pygmy rabbits. J. Wildl. Manage.
64(3): 759-764.
Green, J.S. and J.T. Flinders.
1980. Brachylagus idahoensis.
Mammalian Species No. 125: 1-4.
Forrest, L.R. 1988.
Field Guide to Tracking Animals in Snow. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg,
PA. 193 pp.
Katzner, T.E. 1994.
Winter ecology of the pygmy rabbit (Brachylagus
idahoensis) in Wyoming. M.S. thesis, Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie.
Rachlow, J. and L. Svancara.
2003. Pygmy Rabbit Habitat in Idaho. Project Completion
Report, Challenge Cost Share, Univ. Idaho, Moscow, ID. 28 pp.
Rauscher, R. 1997.
Status and distribution of the pygmy rabbit in Montana. Final
Report, Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks. 19 pp.
Roberts, H. B. 2001.
Survey of pygmy rabbit distribution, numbers, and habitat use in Lemhi
and Custer Counties, Idaho. Tech. Bull No. 01-11, ID Bur. Land
Mgmt.
Simons, E. and J. Laundre. 2001. Predicting suitable habitat for the pygmy rabbit (Brachylagus idahoensis) using a Geographic Information System. Project Completion Report, Challenge Cost Share, Idaho State Univ., Pocatello, ID. 13 pp.
Appendix A.
Persons Knowledgeable about Pygmy Rabbits
California
Pat Lauridson, CA Dept. Fish and Game, Sacramento CA plauridson@dfg.ca.gov
Donald Armentrout, BLM, Susanville CA darmentr@ca.blm.gov
Patrick Kelley, CA State Univ., Stanislaus CA patrickk@esrp.csustan.edu
Idaho
Hadley Roberts, retired FS, Salmon ID hroberts@ida.net
Helen Ulmschneider, BLM, Boise ID helen_ulmschneider@blm.gov
Janet Rachlow, Univ. of Idaho., Moscow ID jrachlow@uidaho.edu
Peggy Bartels, BLM, Burley ID peggy_bartels@blm.gov
Vince Guyer, BLM, Salmon ID vincent_guyer@blm.gov
Montana
Ryan Rauscher, MT Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Missoula MT rauscher@montana.edu
Nevada
Eveline Sequin, Univ. Nevada Reno, Reno NV esequin@unr.nevada.edu
John Himes, TX Parks and Wildlife Dept., Tennessee Colony TX johnhimes@direcway.com
Oregon
Todd Forbes, BLM, Lakeview OR todd_forbes@blm.gov
Utah
Adam Kozlowski, UT Div. of Wildlife Resources, Ogden, UT adamkozlowski@utah.gov
Washington
Dave Hays, WA Dept. Fish and Wildlife, Olympia WA haysdwh@dfw.wa.gov
Doug Keinath, Nat. Diversity Database, Laramie WY dkeinath@uwyo.edu
Todd Katzner,
Imperial College, London, England t.katzner@imperial.ac.uk
Notes.
Provide directions, describe landscape setting, note other animals,
explain why if no pygmy rabbits were found, describe behavior of any
pygmy rabbits seen, etc.
CODES FOR DATA
Burrow Status |
B+FP - used burrow plus brown, green, or black pellets |
B+OP - burrow plus grey pellets |
B - open burrow, no pellets |
UB +FP Unused burrow, fresh pellets |
Col - collapsed burrow |
B+dig - burrow, fresh digging, no pellets |
FP - fresh pellets alone |
Poss Possible PR burrow |
Burrow Details |
T -Clean trail O - Open Col - Collapsed Deb- Debris filled Dig - Fresh digging TS - tracks in snow US - Untracked snow B - At base of bush R - At base of rock E- Enlarged by predator | |||||||
Pellet Quantity |
H - high, lots, a carpet M - moderate F- few | |||||||
Soil |
L - Loam S - sand C - Clay G - Gravelly R - Rocky | |||||||
CanopyCover (20 ft radius) |
S - shrubs F - Forbs G - grass B - bare ground 0 -(0 - Trace) 1 - (1-10%) 2 - (11-25%) 3 - (26-50%) 4 - (51-75%) 5 - (76-100% | |||||||
Grazing use level |
0 - None 1 - slight 2 - light 3 - moderate 4 - heavy 5 - severe Use descriptions from BLM's Landscape Appearance Method |
Burrow # |
UTM Easting |
UTM Northing |
Status |
Burrow details |
Pellets |
Soil |
Canopy Cover |
Grass Use levels |
Pygmy rab seen |
# of entrances |
Comments | |||
Shrub |
Grass |
Forbs |
Bare | |||||||||||
BLM's Landscape
Appearance Method for classifying Grazing Use Level:
Pygmy Rabbit
Summary Sheet
Burrows
Pellets
Pygmy Rabbit |
Cottontail |
Jackrabbit |
4-6 mm - in carpets near burrow is diagnostic |
6-10 mm |
9-12 mm |
Tracks - length of hind foot
Pygmy Rabbit |
Cottontail |
Jackrabbit |
46-71 mm |
77-90 mm |
90-103 mm |
Visual
Pygmy Rabbit |
Cottontail |
Jackrabbit |
Brown
tail Ears 2 1/4 - 2 1/2 in, about
length of head Won't run far, zigzags, often
stops at sagebrush or burrow Small - 8 1/2-11 in |
White tail, obvious from
rear Ears 2 1/5 - 2 3/5 in, about
length of head Bolts fast and far Medium - 12-14 in |
Black-tipped tail (blacktail)
or whitish tail (whitetail) Ears 5-7 in, way longer than
head, and black tipped Bolts fast and far Large - 17-21 in Blacktail; 18-22 in Whitetail. |